Menu costs are costs that result from price changes. An easy way to understand menu costs is by means of a typical example: restaurants. When a restaurant manager wants to change prices, the cost of changing the menus (in order to show the new prices) must be taken into consideration. Therefore, the manager will need to assess whether the increase in prices will cover for the cost of printing new menus.
As Gregory Makiw demonstrates in his article “Small Menu Costs and Large Business Cycles: A Macroeconomic Model of Monopoly”, 1985, this menu costs may lead to a non-socially optimal situation. Indeed, Mankiw’s menu costs model shows how higher menu costs may lead to a situation where prices remain unchanged, thus provoking so called price stickiness.
Contrary to what economists from the New Classical Macroeconomics think, which is that business cycles are originated by shifts in supply (which originate mainly from technological shocks), New Keynesian economists believe that business cycles are originated by price stickiness. This price stickiness might be explained by menu costs, since the slow adjustment of the economy may explain business cycles.
There is a great debate over the following question: are these menu costs really large enough to cause business cycles? An article from Daniel Levy et al., “The Magnitude of Menu Costs: Direct Evidence from Large U.S. Supermarket Chains”, 1997, demonstrates, using empirical evidence, that these menu costs are indeed large enough to cause business cycles. The authors use store-level data from five multistore supermarket chains to directly measure menu costs. They find that the menu costs per store at those chains average more than 35% of net profit margins, which may be forming a barrier to price changes. When applying these findings to theoretical models of menu costs, the authors conclude that these menu costs are large enough to be capable of having macroeconomic significance. Furthermore, they believe that these menu costs may cause considerable nominal rigidity in other industries or markets, thus amplifying the effects on business cycles. These menu costs, they say, vary largely due to local and regional legislation, which may require, for instance, a separate price tag on each item, thus increasing menu costs.
Wassily Leontief, 1906-1999, was a Russian economist, naturalized an American citizen. He was Professor at the University of Kiel, Harvard University and New York University consecutively. He was awarded the 
Tjalling Charles Koopmans, 1910-1985, was an American, Dutch born, economist and Professor at the University of Chicago, from 1946 to1955, and at Yale University, since 1955. Koopmans is mostly known for his theoretical developments in the field of econometrics, especially for works regarding optimal resources allocation. In 1975 he and Leonid Kantorovich were the joint winners of the 
Gérard Debreu, 1921-2004, was a French economist, mathematician and Professor of Economics at the University of California, Berkley. He was the winner of the 
Gary Stanley Becker, born in 1930, is an American economist and Professor at the 
